ENEvaluation administrator
Sets the period, roles and organisation-specific rules.
IS Věda · ISE
Research evaluation under your organisation’s rules.
ISE connects research outputs and project data with the organisation’s methodology, roles and evaluation period.
For evaluation administrators, evaluated staff or units, reviewers and research leadership.
See the process
From start to finish
The organisation sets the period and rules. People verify evidence. The evaluation remains traceable.
Period and rules
The organisation sets the period, methodology and roles before collecting evidence.
Evaluation evidence
Available outputs, projects and other evidence are received from defined sources.
Issues to resolve
Incomplete or incorrect evidence returns to a named person with a clear explanation.
Calculation or review
The system applies configured calculations or prepares evidence for expert review.
Approved result
The result is approved and the period closed with its evidence still traceable.
Who is involved
Who is responsible for what.
Evaluated person or unit
Checks imported evidence and completes or corrects missing data.
Reviewer and leadership
Performs assigned review and works with closed reports.
What happens when something goes wrong
Evidence is incomplete or a rule does not fit
Validation identifies the issue and returns it for correction. The organisation configures metrics and methodology for each period.
The result
A closed evaluation cycle with traceable evidence, rules, corrections and reporting.
Product and integrations
The solution connects to the systems you already use.
Forms, roles and rules follow the way your team works. Every integration keeps the source of truth and error ownership clear.
Explore the product: Research management →Related solutions
What can connect to this workflow
Concise answers
Frequently asked questions
Who is this solution for?
For evaluation administrators, evaluated staff or units, reviewers and research leadership.
What happens when the input is incomplete or incorrect?
Evidence is incomplete or a rule does not fit. Validation identifies the issue and returns it for correction. The organisation configures metrics and methodology for each period.
What is the outcome of the workflow?
A closed evaluation cycle with traceable evidence, rules, corrections and reporting.
Next step
Facing a similar situation?
Tell us how the work runs today and where it gets stuck. We will reply with a concrete next step, not a generic presentation.
Describe my situation