IS Věda · OBD

Research outputs from author to RIV without blind spots.

Researchers submit or import outputs, administrators validate metadata, and the organisation prepares reporting and RIV material.

For researchers, libraries, output administrators and research leadership.

See the process
Crayon story of the solution: Research outputs from author to RIV without blind spots.

From start to finish

A research output from author through quality review to reporting.

  1. New output

    The author creates the output manually or uses an import supported by the deployment.

  2. Authors and funding

    Authors, affiliations, funding and required identifiers are added to the output.

  3. Completeness and duplicates

    Missing data and possible duplicates are flagged before the record moves on.

  4. Fix or approve

    An administrator states exactly what needs fixing, or approves the checked output.

  5. Reporting and RIV

    Verified data feeds reports and, where deployed, material prepared for RIV.

Who is involved

Who is responsible for what.

Author

Creates or imports an output and provides authors, affiliations and funding.

Output administrator

Handles methodology, duplicates and specific data issues.

Leadership

Uses connected reporting and evaluation material.

What happens when something goes wrong

Incomplete or duplicate record

Validation returns a specific field and comment to the author. Links prevent accidental deletion or duplication.

The result

An approved record with change history and material for reporting or RIV.

Product and integrations

The solution connects to the systems you already use.

Forms, roles and rules follow the way your team works. Every integration keeps the source of truth and error ownership clear.

Explore the product: Research management
ORCID and bibliographic sources by deploymentHR systemEPZRepository and reporting

Concise answers

Frequently asked questions

Who is this solution for?

For researchers, libraries, output administrators and research leadership.

What happens when the input is incomplete or incorrect?

Incomplete or duplicate record. Validation returns a specific field and comment to the author. Links prevent accidental deletion or duplication.

What is the outcome of the workflow?

An approved record with change history and material for reporting or RIV.

Next step

Facing a similar situation?

Tell us how the work runs today and where it gets stuck. We will reply with a concrete next step, not a generic presentation.

Describe my situation