ENResearcher or inventor
Provides the idea, description and supporting material.
IS Věda · PDV / SDM
Transfer cases, rights and documents in PDV/SDM.
The initial disclosure, participants, rights, documents and milestones used by the organisation remain in one traceable case.
For researchers, transfer offices, legal teams and research-organisation leadership.
See the process
From start to finish
A transfer case connects participants, rights, documents and confirmed milestones.
New idea
A researcher or transfer office captures the idea before it disappears in email.
Authors and inventors
The responsible person reviews it and adds authors, inventors and context.
Rights and partners
Rights, partners, agreements and supporting documents remain in one case.
Documents and milestones
Configured milestones, deadlines and payments are flagged before they are missed.
Closed case
The closed case preserves decisions, documents and history for future evidence.
Who is involved
Who is responsible for what.
Transfer office
Reviews the case and manages rights, partners, milestones and next steps.
Legal or leadership
Makes assigned decisions and works with approved documents.
What happens when something goes wrong
Evidence is missing or a deadline is near
The case returns to a named person with a reason. The milestone stays visible and history records who supplied the correction.
The result
One traceable case connecting the initial disclosure, participants, rights, documents, milestones and deadlines.
Product and integrations
The solution connects to the systems you already use.
Forms, roles and rules follow the way your team works. Every integration keeps the source of truth and error ownership clear.
Explore the product: Research management →Related solutions
What can connect to this workflow
Concise answers
Frequently asked questions
Who is this solution for?
For researchers, transfer offices, legal teams and research-organisation leadership.
What happens when the input is incomplete or incorrect?
Evidence is missing or a deadline is near. The case returns to a named person with a reason. The milestone stays visible and history records who supplied the correction.
What is the outcome of the workflow?
One traceable case connecting the initial disclosure, participants, rights, documents, milestones and deadlines.
Next step
Facing a similar situation?
Tell us how the work runs today and where it gets stuck. We will reply with a concrete next step, not a generic presentation.
Describe my situation